Truth - not apologies
The efforts by the relatives of those killed on Bloody
Sunday to force the British government to open a new inquiry
into the events of that day have made significant progress.
No-one would have expected the News Letter or Ken Maginnis
to call on the British government to issue an apology to the
relatives but that is what they have done this week. While
the tone of the News Letter's call - in a leading article -
is welcome, Ken Maginnis excused the Paras - calling them
``young, untrained soldiers'' - and rejected calls for an
inquiry.
What must be stressed is that the relatives of the Bloody
Sunday victims are not asking for an apology. In a statement
two weeks ago, John Kelly, Chair of the Bloody Sunday
Justice Campaign, said, ``Let there be no half-baked
apologies from any government ministers. We are not
campaigning for apologies - the time for apologies has come
and gone. No-one should ask for one on our behalf. We demand
the truth. It's as simple as that.''
The truth can only come from an independent public inquiry.
And this week the British government formally rejected a new
inquiry as well as refusing to apologise and Andrew Hunter
MP, Chairman of the Conservative Northern Ireland Committee,
backed his government's position: ```Bloody Sunday' was
orchestrated confrontation and the ensuing tragedy has been
shamelessly exploited by evil men,'' he wrote in a letter to
The Times.
Their positions are untenable in the face of growing
evidence and the growing determination of the relatives and
the people of Derry to have the truth. That determination
was proved was proved by the massive turnout at the march in
Derry.last Sunday. The search for the truth will go on.
Mayhew bins North
The British government's response to the North Report on
parades follows a similar line to its response to the
Mitchell Report in January last year. Both were binned to
appease Unionists in Westminster. And both were binned in
order to avoid dialogue as a means of resolving conflict.
It is not difficult to understand the motivation of the
Unionists in rejecting the North report. Why would they want
an independent commission to decide on parades when they
know that a repeat of their behaviour of last year will
enable them to march wherever they want? And, moreover, they
can do so with the backing of the RUC and the British
government.
The motivation of the British government is, if anything,
more cynical. It is clear that they care for nothing but
their diminishing chances of political survival.
Meanwhile, communities under threat from Orange bigotry must
seek a solution based on equality and genuine dialogue. They
can expect no support from a government which has no moral
right to impose its anti-democratic rule.